The Spanish Inquisition
Put people in a terrible position.
I don’t even like to think about it.
Well sometimes, I like to think about it.
-
Randy Newman
After the discovery of the new world, Spain should have
gained an insurmountable advantage over all the rest of the West. At its peak,
the Spanish Empire ruled about 13% of the earth, a swath of land exceeded up until
then only by the Mongols, whose expansion had been stopped by the first use of
gunpowder in a cannon during the mid-thirteenth century. Instead, France and
England surpassed Spain in economic development. Spain even lost a prolonged
war against the tiny Netherlands. It was not just a brute measure of land that
mattered to progress in the first economy. Social invention and revolution were
essential.
As trade grew in importance, so did diversity. If everyone
is the same, has the same things, there is no value in trading. As people and
economies become more distinct, trade becomes even more valuable. In the midst
of this first economy, Isabella and Ferdinand tried to make Spain pure. They
did it by subordinating their emerging nation-state to religion. This was to
prove economically disastrous, but not in their lifetime.
Isabella (1451-1504) and Ferdinand (1452-1516) rightfully
realized that Europe was not just getting exposure to new products with the
emergent global trade. Europe was losing its cultural purity as the network of
Jews, Muslims, and Asians who formed the trade network along the orient exposed
Europeans to strange beliefs and practices. One response was to draw best
practices from these new people. Spain tried instead to reject them.
After conquering Granada - the last Muslim territory in what is now Spain - these Catholic Monarchs gave Jews and Muslims the choice to convert or leave. This could have made the economy collapse,
since so many Jews filled the role of financiers, chief public officers,
and artisans but a seeming
miracle saved them.
Ferdinand decided to finance Columbus’s venture. Ferdinand
had purchased a copy of Ptolemy’s Geography and confirmed what Columbus told
them about how short a route he might find to the Indies. (Ptolemy had made a
little miscalculation in his estimate of the circumference of the earth,
persuading readers that the distance from Europe to Asia by heading west was
about as far as the distance from Europe to America. Columbus died believing
that he had found this route. He never realized he had instead found a new
world.) The decision to finance Columbus’s venture was part of their decision
not to rely on so many nonbelievers. They knew that they needed economic
breakthroughs to replace the infidels who formed such a big part of the
economy.
“They announced an official policy of homogeneity of
cultural practices, dress and religion, and the ruthless suppression of local
custom, ritual, and belief. In spite of the fact that the growing prosperity of
Spain, as of other European nations, depended on vigorous and heterogeneous
trade throughout the known world, and in spite of the fact that the artisanal
skills which supported lucrative industries like carpet manufacture, ceramics
or brocade-weaving were tightly associated with specific ethnic and religious
groupings, the victorious Spanish regime declared ethnic and doctrinal purity
as the foundations of the stability of the new state.”
Their bold moved
paid off. In
1521, Cortes
conquered
Mexico and
by
1533,
Pissarro
had conquered
Peru.
The
Americas
provided
a
staggering
amount
of
gold
and
silver. Between
1516
and
1520,
Spain’s
average
yearly
income
in
gold
was
200,000
pesos;
between
1551
and
1555
it
was
nearly
2,000,000.
“By
1650,
16,000
tons
of
silver
had
come to Europe,
to
say
nothing of 180
tons
of gold
objects."
It would be hard to turn this treasure into economic stagnation
but, in their pursuit of purity, Spain did.
Further, the
flow
of gold
seemed
to
distort
Spain’s
economy.
No
agricultural
advances
were
made
during
the
prosperity
of Charles’s
reign;
with
a
monopoly
on
selling
supplies
to
the
New
World,
there
was
no
pressure
to
improve
methods.
Commercial
techniques
in
the
sixteenth
century
remained
basically
unchanged
from those
imported
by
Italian
merchants
during
medieval
times.
Following
a
century
of
falling
prices,
Spain suffered
unprecedented
inflation.
Currency
was
gold and
silver
and
both
poured
in
from
the
New
World.
From
1501
to
1550,
prices
more
than
doubled;
by
the
end
of
the
century,
they
had
quadrupled.
With
prices
rising
so
much
faster
in
Spain
than
in
the
rest
of
Europe,
Spain’s
products
soon
could
not
compete
with
foreign
goods.
The
Genoese
“flooded
the
country
with
cheap
manufactured
products,
designed
especially
for
the
Indies,
to
the
serious
detriment
of local
industry.”
Spain
used
its
income
to buy
goods
rather
than
develop
its
own
productive
capacity,
leading
the
Venetian
ambassador
to
write,
“The
gold
that
comes
from
the
Indies
does
on
Spain
as
rain
does
on
a
roof—it
pours
on
her
and
it
flows
away.”
Worst of all, Spain moved in the opposite direction of
England and France. Rather than subordinate the church to the state, it
brutally asserted church power. As the rest of the West was gradually lurching
towards something akin to religious freedom, Ferdinand and Isabella launched
the infamous Spanish Inquisition.
While the English were gradually accepting freedom of
thought, the Spanish were insisting on purity of thought. While the Spanish
were out conquering the people in the new world, the English were giving more
freedoms to the people in their own. Freeman rose to prominence in England,
increasingly taking the place of serfs as farmers. Spain made slaves of
Mexicans and Peruvians, forcing them to work in mines in brutal conditions that
shortened their lives by decades.
It seems odd to contrast
English farmers to Spanish conquistadors. Yet
it
was something as prosaic as farming
that
fueled England’s economic
progress,
bringing
it to a
point
that
it
could
challenge
the
supremacy
of
an
empire
that
had
so much
of the
newly discovered Americas even as its emperor ruled a large portion of Europe.
Leading what could be called a “food- producing revolution,” English farmers
were a key reason that “In the eighteenth century European agriculture was
already capable of obtaining about two and a half times the yield on its seed
normal in the Middle Ages. . . .By 1750 the best English agriculture was the
best in the world. The most
advanced
techniques
were
practiced
and
the
integration
of
agriculture
with
a
commercial
market
economy
had
gone
furthest
in
England,
whose
lead
was
to
be
maintained
for
another
century
or
so."
When the Spanish established colonies in foreign lands,
they were exploiting and extracting. When the British began colonizing later,
they were actually bringing with them a blend of technological and social
inventions that made land more productive. To this day, former British colonies
generally outperform former colonies of France and Spain. In Africa, former
British colony Ghana has per capita GDP about 4X higher than the former French
colony Democratic Republic of Congo. In North America, per capita incomes in
Canada are about 5X higher than in Mexico, a country that had formerly been
under Spanish and French rule. In
Southeast Asia, Singapore has per capita income that is about 20X higher than the
Philippines, where Spain left a legacy of medieval Catholic family planning. As
with a family, past generations largely define prosperity or poverty. History
does not stay in the past. It even defines the options you have for tomorrow.
The mix of social and technological inventions that made
land more productive – as transformative as they were – proved to be mere
prelude to the big revolutions of the industrial economy.
